Fraud Risk Assessment Simulator

🎧 Listen to more in-depth episodes on Spotify! Interactive Simulation: Auditor's Consideration of Fraud Risk

Fraud Risk Assessment Simulator

An auditor must plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud.

Understanding Fraud

Fraudulent Financial Reporting

Intentional misstatements or omissions designed to deceive financial statement users. This is often called "cooking the books" and is usually committed by management.

  • Manipulation of accounting records
  • Misrepresentation of events or transactions
  • Intentional misapplication of GAAP

Misappropriation of Assets

Theft of an entity's assets (defalcation) where the effect of the theft causes the financial statements to be materially misstated.

  • Embezzling receipts
  • Stealing physical assets or intellectual property
  • Causing the company to pay for goods not received

The Fraud Triangle

Three conditions, known as fraud risk factors, are generally present when fraud occurs. The risk is greatest when all three are present.

Incentive / Pressure
Opportunity
Rationalization / Attitude

Auditor's Required Response to Assessed Fraud Risks

Overall, General Response

The auditor must respond to overall fraud risk by adjusting how the audit is conducted:

  • Assigning Personnel: Assign more experienced staff or specialists to the engagement.
  • Supervision: Determine the appropriate level of supervision for the engagement team.
  • Accounting Principles: Evaluate management's selection and application of accounting principles for potential bias.
  • Unpredictability: Incorporate an element of unpredictability in the selection of audit procedures from year to year (e.g., surprise inventory counts).

Response with Specific Audit Procedures

The auditor must design and perform audit procedures whose nature, timing, and extent are responsive to the specific fraud risks identified for each relevant assertion.

  • Nature: Change the type of procedures to obtain more reliable evidence (e.g., use external confirmations instead of internal inquiries).
  • Timing: Perform procedures closer to year-end or throughout the period.
  • Extent: Increase sample sizes or perform more extensive analytical procedures.

Response to Management Override Risk

There is a presumptive risk of management override of controls in every audit. The auditor must perform these specific procedures:

  • Journal Entries: Examine journal entries and other adjustments for evidence of possible material misstatement due to fraud. Focus on nonstandard or unusual entries.
  • Accounting Estimates: Review accounting estimates for biases. Perform a retrospective review by comparing prior-period estimates to actual results.
  • Unusual Transactions: Evaluate the business purpose (or lack thereof) for significant unusual transactions to see if they are designed to conceal fraud.

This simulation is for educational purposes and is based on the provided document. It simplifies complex auditing standards and should not be used for professional audit decisions. Always refer to official GAAS and PCAOB guidance.

COCOMOCPA

Financial Controller / CPA

다음 이전