🎧 Listen to more in-depth episodes on Spotify!

SOC Reporting Process Simulation

Explore the key components and outcomes of a SOC report.

Step 1: Forming the Opinion

The service auditor forms an opinion by evaluating the sufficiency and appropriateness of the evidence obtained during the engagement. The opinion focuses on three key areas in all material respects:

• Fair Presentation: Whether management's description of the service organization's system is fairly presented.
• Suitability of Design: Whether the controls were suitably designed to achieve the control objectives (SOC 1) or service commitments (SOC 2).
• Operating Effectiveness (Type 2 only): Whether the controls operated effectively over the specified period.

Key Consideration: The auditor must evaluate whether any uncorrected misstatements, individually or in aggregate, are material to the report. This evaluation is the foundation for the type of opinion that will be issued.

Step 2: Types of Opinions

Based on the evidence gathered, the service auditor will issue one of four types of opinions. The choice depends on the nature and pervasiveness of any identified issues.

Unmodified (Unqualified)

The best possible outcome. Issued when the auditor concludes that the system description is fairly presented, and controls are suitably designed and (for Type 2) operating effectively in all material respects.

Qualified

Issued when misstatements or control deficiencies are material but not pervasive. The opinion states that "except for" specific matters, the report is fairly presented.

Adverse

The worst outcome. Issued when misstatements or control deficiencies are both material and pervasive. The auditor concludes the report is not fairly presented and controls are not effective.

Disclaimer

Issued when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to form an opinion, and the possible effects could be both material and pervasive. The auditor does not express any opinion.

Step 3: Anatomy of the SOC Report

A SOC 1 or SOC 2 report is a comprehensive document with several key components, each serving a distinct purpose.

Core Components of the Report:

• Management's Description of the System: Prepared by the service organization, this section details the services provided, procedures, controls, and other relevant aspects of the system. It must be detailed enough for users to understand how the system affects them.
• Management's Assertion: A formal written statement from management asserting that, based on the criteria, the system description is fairly presented and the controls are suitably designed (and effective for Type 2).
• Independent Service Auditor's Report: This is the auditor's section, containing their professional opinion. It includes:
  • A title with the word "Independent."
  • Scope, Responsibilities, and Inherent Limitations paragraphs.
  • The auditor's final Opinion (Unmodified, Qualified, Adverse, or Disclaimer).
  • A Restricted Use paragraph, specifying who the report is intended for.
• Auditor's Tests of Controls and Results (Type 2 only): This section provides details on the specific controls tested by the auditor, the nature of the tests, and the results, including any deviations found.

Step 4: Handling Subservice Organizations

Service organizations often use other companies (subservice organizations) to perform some of their services. The SOC report must address how these outsourced functions are handled using one of two methods.

Carve-Out Method

The subservice organization's controls are excluded from the scope of the SOC report.

• The service organization's description identifies the nature of the services provided by the subservice organization.
• It describes the types of controls expected at the subservice organization, known as Complementary Subservice Organization Controls (CSOCs).
• The auditor's report states that its procedures did not extend to the subservice organization's controls.
• This method is practical but provides less information to the report user about the subservice organization.

Inclusive Method

The subservice organization's controls are included within the scope of the SOC report.

• The service organization's description includes details about the subservice organization's system and relevant controls.
• The auditor's procedures and testing are extended to cover the included controls at the subservice organization.
• This provides a more comprehensive view but requires cooperation from the subservice organization and auditor independence from both entities.

Complementary User Entity Controls (CUECs): The report must also describe any CUECs—controls that the user entity itself must implement for the service organization's system to function as intended. The auditor's opinion will state that the service organization's objectives can only be achieved if these CUECs (and any CSOCs) are also operating effectively.